April 21, 2007

Two Little Words (Parental Advisory: Explicit Lyrics)

I wish the Suns would piss me off. I'm more on my writing game when I'm ticked at somebody's general stupidity, and the Suns just don't bring that out of me these days. Don't get me wrong...I'm grateful to have such a likable group of guys representing us in the NBA, and I would never take it for granted. I have a long memory, and trapped in there are images of Robert Horry's bad attitude, Oliver Miller's fat ass, Marbury's selfishness, and Charles Barkley's all of the above.

Maybe it's just the culture of Phoenix. I don't know if any Suns team (or Diamondbacks or even Cardinals team) has raised the ire of fans in the history of the state of Arizona -- bad ownership and management notwithstanding. We're just too nice here. After all, this IS a state where drivers actually stop for jay-walking pedestrians. This is a place where bad guys come for redemption, and once they leave, they're back on America's Most Wanted (again, I'm looking at you, Chuck).

We're far too forgiving of guys on our team. At least we know how to hold a grudge. Well, at least until the player is offered a front office job.

If I can't be pissed at the Suns, maybe I can get pissed with them (in the American sense, not the Australian sense). One thing that's always been lacking from our sports culture is that Fuck You* attitude that comes with being openly disrespected.

The Suns can't play defense.

FUCK YOU!

The Suns style will never win a championship.

FUCK YOU!

Nash didn't deserve his MVPs, and shouldn't get a third in a row.
You get the idea. They seem content to be underestimated and under-appreciated. Maybe it's the laid back personae of D'Antoni and Nash that permeates the locker room and pressers that keeps things on an even keel. Maybe it's a holdover of Jerry Colangelo's family friendly environment. It's not like the Suns don't have players with those attitudes. Witness Raja Bell.

Case in point: Why did Kwame Brown get away with this? Sure, the officials were in their own little La La Land on the play (and most of that series, until Raja made a point to expose their deficiencies), but someone on the Suns team should have either a) sent Brown into the third row, b) ripped his jock off on national television, or c) clotheslined him on the next trip down court. I have a feeling that the incident wouldn't have even happened if Amare was on the court. At the very least, I like to believe that Kwame would have found himself in the third row, regardless if it happened.

All I know is that this team needs to understand one thing -- they're only the sexy pick to win it all, and no one outside of Arizona really expects them to succeed. I have but two words for all those people who don't stop for jaywalkers, and I hope the Suns start to express it for all of us.

Say It Ain't So, BJ!

I read something earlier today that really gets my goat, grates my cheese, hacks my Shaq, and overall makes me want to open a vein, fill a snifter, light a cigar and wait for the sweet hereafter to take my soul. As noted in the entry above, I have been needing something to light a fire in my pants without having to get a shot of penicillin.

And here it is. Chris Ballard of Sports Illustrated was kind enough to highlight the similarities between Dirk Nowitzki and our very own Steve Nash. Although I have openly noted my frustration regarding best-friend opponents, it was something else that Mr. Ballard decided to share with the world that left my plate full of Parmesan. When asked who he thought should be the league M.V.P., Amare felt the need to be honest -- and telling of why this season had a different feel than the last one.

[I]t is interesting that Stoudemire made an effort not to say Nash, the man some would argue is responsible for much of Stoudemire's success. Especially right before the playoffs are to begin, when chemistry is paramount. (Told of the comment, one member of the Suns said, "What do you expect from a guy who chooses a jersey number of one?").

Jump back, Loretta!

(One guess who the unnamed Suns player was.)

The article goes on to paint a rather intriguing picture of Nash's inner workings, giving fans a glimpse of the fire burning in MV3's gut and the occasional frustration he feels when the Suns offense deteriorates into Sticky Ball (as I've come to call the offense when the passing stops and the bricks start dropping).

That's great to know, but my thoughts keep back pedalling to Amare's comments and the anonymous team mate's response.

A couple days go, Amare's answer to the M.V.P. question made waves in Phoenix, with fans questioning his priorities and loyalty. We gave him the benefit of the doubt a day later when he "clarified" that he meant that Kobe is in his top three.

Fine.

We accepted that. But now I'm not so sure that I can.

We know that Shaq is (always has been, always will be, apparently) Amare's top choice for M.V.P. Which begs the question -- who is third on his list? More precisely, who is third on his list when the question included the phrase "BETWEEN NASH AND NOWITZKI"?

Perhaps a guy who chooses a jersey number of one.

Two years ago, Steve won his first M.V.P. award, and he asked all his team mates to join him on stage to share the moment with him. (There is a link to the video on that page, and you can see all the action starting eight minutes and 20 seconds in.)

Notice how all his team mates shake hands, man hug, and beam with pride as they approach Steve one by one (Shawn seems most pleased). Notice how Amare slinks to the back of the crowd, smiling politely as the others laugh at Jimmy Jackson handing his camera to a reporter in the front row to get a memento. I remember watching that press conference live, then commenting to the people watching with me that Amare had a look on his face like he felt that he should have been up there receiving the award.

Obviously, Steve Nash is not Amare Stoudemire's idea of the Most Valuable Player of the NBA. That's fine. It's his opinion and he is not alone in it.

But to be that vocal, and to give a national reporter that kind of fodder? To openly disrespect his team mate and captain...the guy who feeds him the ball night in and night out?

I sensed it two years ago, and he is confirming it with every thoughtless utterance about the topic. Amare is going to kill this team.

Nash is frustrated. Marion can't wait to get out of town. Mike the coach just rolls his eyes, while Mike the general manager is probably thinking up ways to save his team.

Did Amare not say that he learned his lesson while sitting out for 79 games last season? Has Steve not been praising Amare's growth as a team mate all season long?

Something is going on in the Suns locker room, and no one on the outside can say for certainty just how volatile it might be. I'm not one to presume anything based solely on suspicion, but we have been granted enough snippets to start piecing together a hazy picture of the chemical explosion that may obliterate this team come June -- whether or not we see a championship parade.

For all our sake and sanity, I hope that I'm wrong. I hope to all that is mighty and holy in this universe that it is all just a case of poor journalism meant to sell newspapers and magazines. (If that's the case, then they should all be fired, or at least banned from interviewing Suns players. I don't like to be misled, and I certainly don't like inflammatory journalism for the sole sake of selling subscriptions.)

So Coach D'Antoni, please corral the situation. MVSteve, please exercise your position as co-captain, and right the course of this ship.

And Amare -- say it ain't so.




*Note to self: Get a new keyboard for the P.C.

April 20, 2007

Daddy? Yes, Son?

I wonder if Charlie Murphy will do one his True Hollywood Stories about the summer of 1979.

"It was a hot day in July, like, not just hot, but balls sweating when we was sittin' nekkid on a basketball court, hot, humid like. So anyways, me an' my boys was out at the beach in North Carolina, and there was these honeys eyein' us. We was like 19 or 20 at the time, and this girl, Nancy I think her name was came up and says she wants to have my baby! I was like, "Woah! Hold up, mama! You got money for a motel?" And she DID! Now I ain't never met this girl in my life, but we was high and she was offering up some free shiz, ya know what I'm sayin..."


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Charlie Murphy (Eddie's brother)

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Josh Howard

Thank You, Suns...Thank You

The league, this week, released its final attendance numbers for the season. Normally I don't pay much attention to this bit of info because, let's face it, no one really cares except David Stern and his marketing department. It's a chance for them to say collectively, "Look at us! Mommy was right! We ARE popular!" But I read the article anyway because our hometown journalism squad hasn't been giving the fans much to look at, since the Suns finished the season by making the Rockets and Clippers earn every inch of their respective do-or-die wins.

Basically I was just hoping for at least a Suns bone to gnaw on for a few minutes. Though there was no direct mention of Clockwork Orange, I did manage to find something -- however imaginary it may be. First, some trivial observations:

1. LeBron James entered the league in 2003. The highly anticipated rookie was projected to put fans back in the seats and raise public awareness of the NBA to heights not seen since Jordan's return from early retirement -- again. League attendance did not rise that year.

2. Shaq and Kobe, the dream media pairing, ran the table between 2000 and 2002. They were touted as the next big dynasty in the wake of Chicago's 8 year reign, and their match ups were shoved down our throats like a pork chop at an intervention for Lara Flynn Boyle. League attendance did not rise.

3. In 2004, San Antonio and Detroit battled it out for the first ever National Boredom Association title. No one watched it. No one cared. Defense wins championships, but offense wins sponsors. Attendance was on the verge of hitting an all time low.

4. Soon after the Spurs/Pistons Valium Bowl, Steve Nash signed a free agent deal with the Phoenix Suns, joining the explosively high flying tandem of Amare Stoudemire and Shawn Marion.

Now, I don't have the numbers to back it up, nor am I inclined to do the research. It's tedious, it's boring, and probably won't even support my theory anyway. But there is a visible correlation between fan attendance and television ratings, and those numbers have been on the rise, as well. People see it on TV, then they want to see it in person. It's standard demographics. Anyway.

Here's the meat on that bone...

The NBA broke its attendance record for the third straight year, drawing more than 21.8 million fans during the 2006-07 season.
"The third straight year," they said. From opening tip 2004 until the Clippers secured their lottery fate in the last game of the 2007 season, attendance has been going up. That, my friends, is the Steve Nash era.

Oh, I'm sure that some would argue that, because the top selling teams in the league are all in LeBron country (it's the Midwest, what else is there to do?), the overall attendance figures can be attributed to "King James". They'd like us to think that, of course. It would validate the media's premature coronation (I wanted to say "immaculation" for a satirically sweet pun, but it isn't a word...damn. Try it out anyway..."premature immaculation") of his royal blandness.

If that's true, then where was the attendance spike in 2003-04? The truth (the one I made up in my head, that is) is that ABC, ESPN, and TNT were scrambling to pick up Suns games late in the year when the team showed that, not only was it the most entertaining product on the court, it also had championship potential.

What a sell! Imagine -- fans watching games all the way into June! Has that ever happened before?!

It certainly didn't happen the year before the Suns run (and gun) started. Just ask San Antonio and Detroit what their media share was. Probably not even enough to pay for the parade.

So could it be that our very own Phoenix Suns, the team everyone outside of Texas and Los Angeles actually loves to watch (and the fans in those areas love to hate), is the team responsible for bringing the NBA back from the dead? Sacramento and Dallas didn't do it, and they were supposedly doing the same thing the Suns are doing now (false...myth...bullsh...).

Now, the only reason I bring this whole thing up is that I noticed something else in that article. The last time this happened (at least three straight seasons of attendance increase), Michael Jordan's Bulls were in the middle of their first three-peat. Jordan was already a bona fide star in the league, complete with Nike deal and Coke commercial (he soon switched to Gatorade -- made by the same company, more kid-conscious product). But the league's attendance numbers didn't coincide with his teams rise to championship heights. No. According to the article, the first year of rising attendance was...

1992.

There are a two significant events that occurred that year, most notably the Olympic Dream Team storming its way to the Gold in Barcelona. The other event: the star of that particular collection of NBA legends -- the one who drew the most attention and was the team's leading scorer -- had been traded earlier that summer. Charles Barkley debuted with the Phoenix Suns, and over the next four years (his tenure with the Suns), the league's attendance rose every season.

Coincidence? Maybe. But two big time acquisitions by the Phoenix Suns leading to two perennial runs of huge explosions in entertainment value and points scored across the league coinciding with rising attendance? Coincidence? Maybe not.

It seems that the Suns are onto something here, and the league might want to take a closer look. If conspiracy theories are true (and I'm CERTAINLY not one to perpetuate them), then we should expect a big thank you from the Stern Corp. and his band of Merry Officials this post-season.

OK...I'm joking about that. It will be nice enough just to have the officials call games in accordance with the rules changes and points of emphasis established earlier in the decade. Those changes, you may remember, were meant to speed up the game and increase the scoring, as well as cut down on all that brutish interior play. They were also implemented at the behest of one Jerry Colangelo.

Coincidence? I don't know for sure, but it sure is something interesting to think about.

Not to be presumptuous, but on behalf of the Phoenix Suns...you're welcome, David.

April 19, 2007

Thanks, Adam

This is How it Should Be

Could this year's post season bracket be more tailor made for our team? Could this be the year that the Phoenix Suns bring it home? Could the set up be more perfect?

Let's assume that records hold, and everything plays out the way we hope. Here is what we have to look forward to over the next two months of our Suns loving lives.

1. A first round match up with our hated rival and arch enemy, the Los Angeles Lakers and Kobe Bryant. And who leads them? None other than Phil Jackson - the head of the snake that envenomed Suns fans 14 years ago. These two teams had a memorable series last year, and this year's version should be twice as satisfying for us, and twice as ugly for them. Beat L.A.

2. Like their namesake, San Antonio has been the motivation for the Suns' current rise to elite status -- spurring the team to improve, to fight, to win. Two years ago, they denied us a chance at immortality. Amare Stoudemire became the highest scoring first time Western Conference Finals participant in the history of the league, crushing Lew Alcindor's record with 37 points per game against the best defensive big man in the game today. Despite last season, the Spurs are the reigning champion in the Suns' eyes, and the dragon to be slayed on their path to the holiest of grails.

3. The new rivals. Best friends and former team mates who have played to a draw in the Steve Nash Suns era. The Mavericks dispacthed an injury ravaged Suns team a season ago, and many say that they got off lucky -- that if Amare, Kurt, and Raja were in the mix, the Suns would be defending NBA champions. But we live in a world determined by what is, not 'what if', and the Suns are out to prove once again that Mark Cuban made a fatal error in letting Nash walk so easily. Best friends who should now be bitter enemies, like two men vying for the affections of the same beautiful woman (and we've seen the kind of woman Nash got).

4. The former champion, or the current champion, it doesn't matter. The Suns can prove that Dallas' massive choke job against the Miami Heat last year was no fluke. The better team truly won. The Suns have shown their mastery at removing major players from big games, and their relative youth and stamina should have the Suns running rings - yes RINGS - around an aging, plodding Miami team. The true challenge (and more likely one) will be the Pistons. They've been there, done that, and want to go there and do it again. But this time, they will be there without the NFL-like defense that won the title in 2004. This time, they'll have to run. They'll have to score. Will Chauncey Billups expose Nash's defensive deficiencies? Of course he will. And this will be the toughest test of all for Phoenix.

After fighting their way through an elite Western Conference, they'll be facing a rested Eastern Champion hungry to prove itself as a member of the league's elite. Dallas, Phoenix, San Antonio -- no mention of Detroit or Miami. They have something to prove, but so do the Suns.

Run-and-gun won't win a championship.

The Suns don't play defense.

The Suns can't play a half court game.

The Suns rotation is too short.

The Suns are too small.

The Suns will wear down

This post season bracket has been fitted by Armani himself for a historic Suns run.

Beat the rival. Beat the champion. Beat the best enemy. Beat the east. Bring home the trophy.

You Ready?

It's not often that I find something worth saving on YouTube, but this bit of video is just what the doctor ordered to cure our late season malaise as fans. I'll warn that the lyrics are a bit Parental Advisory at some points, but if you're busy listening to the song, then you're not watching the highlights. It's the one that TNT has been using all season long for it's promos, "Remember the Name" by Fort Minor. Not a bad little ditty, and perfectly suited to the object de' art that is the subject of this particular video treat.

Watch out, National Basketball Association. This is the kind of brilliance that is about to victimize every team not named the Phoenix Suns. Let the playoffs roll.



LET'S GO!

Wishing on a Star

There's a fine line between a dream and a nightmare, and it all depends on one's perspective. Sometimes it's hard to tell if it's one or the other until you wake up the next morning with a bad case of the shakes -- like an alcoholic in Salt Lake City. Consider, if you will, the sequel to last year's first round playoff match up between the Los Angeles Lakers and Phoenix Suns.

After openly tanking the final regular season match up between the teams last season in order to gift wrap the seven seed for L.A., the Suns dream came true. It quickly turned into a nightmare as the Lakers took a 3-1 series lead behind the unexpected team play of Kobe Bryant, the rough and tumble physical play of the Laker front court, and a blatant non-call by referee Bennett Salvatore in game 4*. The Lakers, it seemed, were the ones living the dream.

Then Raja Bell got mad.



The would-be Tinsel Town Cinderellas suddenly were exposed as Sleeping Beauty, and by the time they woke up, they had a bad case of the shakes, like an alcoholic in Salt Lake City. Oops.

And did the N.B.A.'s resident prima donnas learn anything from that nationally televised game 7 beat down? Nope. While the Golden State Warriors were busy pummelling the lottery bound Trailblazers, the Lakers were fighting their way to a win in Sacramento. A loss would have assured Los Angeles the eighth seed and possibly a more favorable match up with the top seeded yet burned out Dallas Mavericks. But for whatever reason, Phil Jackson still believes that he has a better chance of slowing the Suns' attack, despite the fact that his team will be facing a more potent and formidable foe in Amare Stoudemire.

Come on, Phil. Your team got back-doored last year by a weaker Suns team, yet you still feel that you have a better shot against their running and passing than the one-on-one style of Avery Johnson? Seriously?

Whatever. I can almost guarantee that the rule of Hollywood will follow to the letter when the sequel fails to live up to the standard set by the original. The Suns are bigger and stronger inside, have developed a surprisingly efficient half-court game, and are not as reliant on the long ball as they were a year ago. And guess what...the Suns are a better defensive team with Kurt Thomas available 20 minutes a game.

To top it all off, the league sent a message that referees will be under tighter scrutiny than ever before, and poor officiating will no longer be tolerated.

Welcome to your worst nightmare, L.A.

You thought blowing a 3-1 series lead was bad, wait until you face a more complete and determined Suns team on a mission to prove once and for all that run-and-gun is here to stay.

Suns in 5 (but don't be shocked if they sweep).



*Authors note: To this day that makes me sick. Watching it now, I think to myself, 'What a [expletive deleted] joke.'

April 17, 2007

On a Personal Note

We're down to the last game of the 2007 regular season, so there's not much to talk about that hasn't already been beaten to death. The playoff match ups have yet to be set, and I feel that this is the perfect time to take a step back and reflect on my personal history, giving myself a break before I dive head first into playoff basketball - a moment of reflection, if you will.

It is no secret that, despite the long odds against it, I would very much like to write officially for the Phoenix Suns. My derision for professional sports writers is well documented on the azcentral Suns article message boards, and I fancy myself as the antidote to the bland, repetitive reporting contained therein. I prefer the more rich, wry, personal story-telling style of writers such as Bill Simmons to the dry and lifeless commentary found in most sports journalism. Writing shouldn't be a job, rather a recording of history and personal perception that gives the story of the day a life of its own, allowing a reader 20 years from now to relive the emotion and relevance of the events, if only through the heart and eyes of someone who was there.

I have been a writer since the second grade, when the assignment was to make up a story involving a space ship landing in the school's playground. Now, to be honest, I have never been able to create fantasy, even as a child with an overactive imagination. Everything I did then always had to be grounded in reality in some significant manner because I wanted to believe that "this could happen," and that quality holds to this day. So I wrote a story about the space shuttle landing (I never said the reality was absolute), and the astronauts giving us all an individual tour. All the other kids told about Martians and flying saucers, and I came up with humans and the space shuttle. To be fair, this was during the early days of the shuttle program, so it's safe to say that my creativity was, always has been, and always will be shaped by actual events in some way.

I never saw myself as a professional writer in my early days, nor was I ever really encouraged to be one. It just seemed like a novelty act, I guess. So my interests turned elsewhere.

I was small for my age growing up. Under-sized and underweight, people thought I was in fourth grade even as I transitioned into junior high. Not surprisingly, I was the stereotypically last kid chosen for team sports. But many a sixth grader was embarrassed to see a ball sailing over their heads during kick ball after the chorus of "easy out! easy out!" when it was my turn at the plate. Same thing with soft ball. I didn't always make contact, but when I did, there were plenty of kids hauling ass to the outfield to retrieve an unexpectedly well-hit line drive while I was running as fast as my little legs would carry me to second base.

Then there was basketball. God, I loved playing basketball, even if I didn't understand why. The ball was so big in my hands, I became a master of the "granny shot," which again yielded results that left bigger kids stunned. I just seemed always to have a knack of accomplishing feats beyond my apparent capabilities. And I was the king of hustle. I was the kid racing out of bounds for a loose ball, jumping in the air to catch it and toss it back to a teammate in one quick motion. I surprised myself on several occasions because these were the kinds of acts that the little guy wasn't supposed to do. I've always been an athlete, I've just never had the body.

So when high school came, I didn't even think about sports. I didn't even want to take regular P.E. because I always ended up in the class with the jocks, and they just lifted the curve well beyond my reach. I finally grew to a normal height my junior year (I didn't hit 5' until the end of my freshman year), but by that time the lines were drawn, and I was on the outside looking for something of my own. That's when I found dance. To this day, I don't know how my sister convinced me to do it, but I had to take one more year of P.E., and I wasn't about to run the track in 110 degree weather. So to dance I went, and in dance I stayed - for the next 16 years.

I won't get into all the gory details, but I turned out to be really good at it. So good that I eventually became a teacher and assistant director of the studio I attended. I learned more about the human body and how it works than anyone outside of professional medicine should ever know.

Somewhere in the middle of all this learning, though, the Suns had an incredible postseason run in which they made it to the NBA Finals for the first time in 17 years. I had never gotten into watching sports on television back then, but the whole Valley got swept up in Suns fever that year, and I was one of the hapless victims. I've been a die hard fan ever since, so much so that I decided that I wanted to learn how to play again. The funny thing about being a dancer is that it gave me an insight to the nuances of the game that a lot of people don't seem to appreciate. To me, there is nothing more beautiful in all of sports than a well-executed fast break (except maybe a split-finger fastball with a hard bite).

So to basketball I returned. February 1995, I bought myself a backyard hoop and new Spalding outdoor ball, and I went to work on my jump shot. I studied the best - Dan Majerle, Kevin Johnson, Charles Barkley, Danny Ainge - so I had no shortage of learning tools to nail down my mechanics. After two months of taking dozens, if not HUNDREDS, of jumpers every day, I could hit from anywhere, wing to wing up to 20 feet out. I practiced coming off screens, bouncing the ball to myself for a quick catch-and-shoot. I worked on a right handed baby hook, flashing across the lane and banking it in every time. I even worked on my version of Michael Jordan's falling-away-sideways shot that was so hard to time, but so satisfying to nail.

Left-handed, right-handed...you name it, I could splash the net. I used my knowledge of the human body to perfect my mechanics, releasing softly at the peak of a 24-inch standing vertical that left me hanging in the air for what seemed like ten seconds at a time. In two months, I had turned myself into one hell of an accurate shooter...then I moved to Chicago. It seems that I took the predictable weather and stagnant air for granted, because once I got to the WINDY city, I couldn't hit the broad side of a fat lady.

Nonetheless, my basketball education continued on the playgrounds of Chicago's south side (in the white neighborhoods, of course). I learned that having a defender in your grill sure does make getting a shot off more difficult, and the wind played cruel tricks on the rare occasions I found myself open. So I did what I always did when I couldn't do what I wanted to do. I learned how to do something else. I started playing a new position. I went from shooting guard to point guard in one afternoon of humiliation and frustration.

My friend, Tony, his 14 year old brother-in-law, Ricky, and I made it a point to play ball three or four times a month, depending on the weather. We played on good days, of which there were few, and even on some wet and windy days just to get out of the house. Our usual playground was a park about a mile and a half from U.S. Cellular field, where the White Sox play. It was everything that I was not used to - uneven court that held the rain water in the most inappropriate places, tight rims with chain-linked nets, one of which was hanging precariously off half the rim, and the good backboard stood directly between us and the sun...when it shown.

It was tough, physical east coast style basketball, and the fact that their Bulls beat my Suns in the 1993 Finals was always a point of emphasis during every contest. "You're playing like the Suns in game 6, J!" "If that's how they play in Phoenix, it's no wonder we kicked your asses!" Ha ha ha.

It was spirited and intense, and the no-blood-no-foul rule applied. But it was fun, especially when I was the first to 21 after making five free throws in a row. Yes, I can still shoot. I never gained the quickness or explosiveness to blow by either one of them, but my dance background still made me the superior athlete. I was fast, agile, and in control, and my steady stream of soaring under-the-basket reverse lay ins were a constant source of ridicule as I "look like a dancer" whenever I flew from one side of the lane to the other, pausing in mid-air to turn and shoot. "CHINK!" That's how we play in Phoenix.

One particularly humid, partly cloudy day, we were shooting around preparing for our last game of cut throat when a group of kids showed up wanting to use the court. "We'll play you for the court," one of the older ones said. "That's OK," was Tony's reply, "we're just going to play one more, then we're outta here." Depending on the perspective, common sense either prevailed or failed as we decided that we may as well just play them, since we were leaving anyway. So it was the three of us, who had never played as a team before, playing three of them. By the looks of it, they were in high school, and I figured that we might show them a thing or two.

Five minutes later, they were up ten zip. Though we never asked, it was clear that these guys played together on their high school basketball team. Great. Their friends were laughing, they were just breezing by us, and Tony and I were too busy giving each other harsh looks for trying to shoot contested jumpers to get back on defense.

When I watched professional games on TV, I never could figure out why defenders never turned and ran or tried to grab a ball that flew over their heads on a fast break. Watching pass after pass sail effortlessly over my head before ending in a lay up, I thought to myself, "Why am I not reaching up to grab that ball? It's going right over me!" Then I realized how difficult it truly is to jump straight up while back pedalling at a near sprint.

We were getting our asses handed to us, and I had had enough. To the opposition's surprise, I called time out and gathered my troops. I heard them tell their friends on the baseline, mockingly, "They're probably calling a play."

No. I simply told Tony and Ricky that we were NOT going to get shut out. We were on the broken net, but the sun wasn't in our eyes, so there was going to be no excuse not to hit at least one shot. "I'm playing point. When I give you the ball, shoot it!" Time in.

I checked the ball at half court and walked it to the right wing. Tony and one of the kids were fighting for position at the free throw line, while Ricky and another kid were moving back and forth in the left corner behind them. My defender slacked off, practically daring me to shoot from 15 feet. So I did. "Chink."

"Nice shot," he said with genuine surprise and admiration. Now it was a different game. The three of us breathed a collective sigh of relief, comforted by the fact that we weren't going down without a fight. We relaxed, and suddenly we played as a team. I brought the ball up court, and when one of my guys broke free, I got them the ball. When they didn't, they screened for me and I shot it. We missed some, and we made some. So did the other team. I think the final score was 21-10, but we had certainly saved face and earned a little respect.

On the drive home, Tony said with a certain reverence, "THAT'S how we play ball in Chicago!"

And I said, "Yeah, but it was Phoenix that kept us from being shut out."

Touche.

It doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of the world and all its intricacies, I suppose. But a sweetly satisfying dignity accompanies an event that highlights an individual's hidden skills, regardless of the meaning the circumstance holds for anyone else. The talent has always been there, waiting for an opportunity to break free and prove its worth...for whatever it's worth. And it feels good to know that others got a chance to see it, however briefly, and recognize that there is more to this under-sized, underweight closet athlete than meets the untrained eye. Given the opportunity, I could do whatever I damn well want.

Maybe I should become a writer for the Phoenix Suns.

April 16, 2007

Controversy? Me?

I am not one who thrives on controversy. I don't believe that attention should be given more to stories and events that ruffle the feathers of a few to the point that the whole bird is squawking. I prefer to have the information presented to me, without the input of pundits and "experts", whose opinions have a nasty habit of clouding one's own perceptions. In short - I want facts, not opinions.

At the risk of turning into a hypocrite, I feel compelled to throw in my two and three quarter cents regarding race in athletics. From the South Carolina flag controversy to CBS firing Don Imus, it seems that politics is interfering with life and sports in such a way that I can't even watch NASCAR -not because it's traditionally a "redneck sport", but because I'm sick of the word "race".

Right now I wonder why anyone is piling more manure on this molehill of an issue.

For the record, yes, I am white. No, I do not know what it is like to be a black American. Those facts in and of themselves, however, do not invalidate my opinions. I am also a very intelligent individual who has lived in several "multicultural" neighborhoods and who has travelled outside my own country. I have a relatively unique world perspective. That fact in and of itself, however, does not validate my opinions. I make no pretenses either way. I just call it like I see it.

Enough set up, let's get into the conflict. Act II.

As reported on ESPN's Outside the Lines, South Carolina football coach Steve Spurrier made some unsolicited comments regarding the Confederate flag.


"It was embarrassing last year when [game day commentators] were doing the Gameday, and some dude was waving that Confederate flag behind the TV screen. It's just embarrassing to me, to our team, our school, our state. That's my opinion."


Anyone unaware of the South Carolina Confederate flag controversy should look here. If you add "NCAA" to the end of that search bar, you'll see how ugly it truly gets. Basically, the NCAA banned postseason play in the state of South Carolina until all Confederate flags are gone.

On one side, there is a proud people who feel that history is best served by preserving and admiring a major part of their cultural identity. On the other side, there is a proud people who feel that history is best served by removing and forgetting a major part of their cultural identity.

The flag proponents say that the flag represents the soldiers who fought and died for their country under it. The opponents say that it is a symbol of slavery.

Now, I could be mistaken on this, so don't sue me if this proves to be inaccurate. But it seems to me that the other flag - the Stars and Stripes - has been flying over this country in one manifestation or another ever since Betsy Ross was commissioned to construct something that would inspire Francis Scott Key to write a poem that would become our national anthem. It is the flag that served as the national symbol when slavery was OK even in the northern states. Subsequently, it was the flag that waved over a land of over 100 years of post-Civil War segregation, subjugation, murder, rape, torture, and denial of blacks, as well as their citizenship and equality.

So, the way it's been presented to me, the argument goes like this...

The Ku Klux Klan uses the Confederate flag as a symbol of hate, therefore the flag symbolizes all that is wrong with this country.

The U.S. government uses the Stars and Stripes as a symbol of freedom and equality, despite its overall actions to the contrary, therefore that flag symbolizes all that is great about this country.

Again, that's MY take. The truth is, no one ever brings up the Stars and Stripes flag in these arguments - probably for that very reason. It would expose the hypocrisy and ignorance of the entire anti-Confederate argument. Not that the NAACP doesn't find a way to do that, anyway.

I don't have a direct quote because I don't have the OTL video for the segment, but a prominent member of the NAACP suggested that students on South Carolina school campuses aren't as outraged because they're used to seeing the flags. According to the gentleman, "They don't know any better," and it's up to others to tell these students better. In other words, 'these kids don't associate the Confederate flag with slavery, so we have to make them in order to perpetuate this conflict'.

Again, that's just my interpretation.

So who's to blame for the controversy? Is it the KKK for using the Stars and Bars as their personal calling card? Is it the southerners who maintain the flag's pride and dignity despite it's bastardization? Or is it the people who simply refuse to let it go?

I'll admit, I buy into the argument that the flag represents something good. I believe that the Confederacy was right in principle, if not in practice. The Federal government has usurped so much power from the States, that we've become dependent on the Federal for everything. That's exactly what the Confederates were trying to stop. (Slavery was just the flint spark that lit the powder keg.) And the fact that thousands of men fought and died for their principles should be commended. After all, isn't that what the government is asking kids to do to this day? Why deny those men their honor on the basis of dishonorable men who simply are not representative of an entire ideal?

But that's what this country has turned into. A nation of presumed individualism that has become dependent on this ideal that people should act in the most inoffensive manner so that we can coexist as a nation. Think about the irony for a moment - individuals conducting themselves in a group manner. Worse, people seem to be confusing groups with individuals. That is to say, everyone in a group is expected to act the same, therefore the group is representative of the individual just as the individual is representative of the group.

It just doesn't work that way. As much as the idealists (really, people who want everyone else to think like they do) would like everyone to get along and share the same ideals, if not the same beliefs, it just doesn't happen. Hell, Christians can't even agree on a belief system. And what happens when one member of a belief system disagrees with the system itself?

CONTROVERSY!

Controversy sells newspapers and brings the spotlight of attention on those who would otherwise go unnoticed. Like the Rutgers Scarlet Knights second place basketball team. No one remembers the losers of the big game, unless something incredibly stupid or spectacular (or spectacularly stupid) happens. In this case, it DID! Thank you, Don Imus.

By now, we've all heard the comments he made days after the Rutgers women lost in the NCAA tournament. It was sickening, it was stupid, and it was unwarranted, but it shouldn't come as any surprise to anyone. We are talking about talk radio - the bastion of bigotry, sexism, and religious intolerance. Even aside from that fact of free-to-air life, this should not have come as a shock to anyone.

I ask again, whose fault is it, really?

Is it the old, rich, white bigot? Is it the network that employs him? Or is it the legions of black "artists" from whom Imus ever got the idea to string those words together?

What old white person speaks like that?

Yes, there is a certain amount of hatred and/or ignorance that underlies his comments. Yes, he claims that he simply made a bad joke. But "nappy-headed hos"? Where was the NAACP's outrage with John Singleton? After all, he is a black man that is presumably representative of the so-called race, isn't he? Why should he be exempt from his use of such hateful language in his movies when it so clearly influences white culture?

There is a small history of black leaders condemning rap music for its inherent misogyny and liberal use of the word "nigger". But usually the argument against the music (and black comedians, for that matter) is quashed because the people using the language are "keeping it real" or "expressing themselves the only way they know how". Whatever. I'm not a big fan of double standards, and I'll never understand why groups that praise black performing artists for their representation of the culture as a whole will just as quickly condemn a white person for repeating what they hear. And to get someone who is guilty of perpetuating or condoning a double standard to acknowledge it is like pulling teeth with Teflon tweezers. I won't even go there, except to throw it out there for argument's sake. This is about accountability.

Too many times we have seen white people sacrificed as scapegoats for the behaviour of those who are not white. I acknowledge that the United States has a history of racism, and I believe that we still have a long way to go in making reparations for it. But what's the sense in ripping out the stitches to remind us that we cut them? When does the hurt stop and the healing begin?

I know that my opinions sound racially driven, and in part they are. As I said, I am white. But that does not invalidate the argument that the recent history of racially charged negative behavior by white people can be traced directly to the actions of the victims of racism. We have been disarmed by programs and philosophies such as Affirmative Action, so why keep handing stupid people the bullets? You should know by now that some idiot out there is going to fire into the air aimlessly, and eventually someone is going to get hurt. Just ask the Scarlet Knights.

So it's my opinion that something needs to happen on both sides of the argument before any of this stops. Take care of your own before trying to deal with ours. That goes for the southerners who let the KKK get away with using their flag for despicable purposes, just as well as it goes for the NAACP for letting their own "race" create roadblocks to its own cultural reclamation.

April 15, 2007

KG, or Not KG?

It's an agonizing thought process - balancing talent and championship potential with red ink. Everything hinges on events yet to transpire.

Does Kevin Garnett want out of Minnesota? Of course not. He sees himself as the Timberwolves' version of his friend and idol, the late Kirby Puckett, sticking with the franchise that drafted him through a career roller coaster of tumult and success. He has never publicly spoken about leaving Minnesota, whether through his own desire or the team's. The closest we've come to knowing what is really brewing in that intense mind is the now-famous quote, "Thank God for opt-outs."

Kevin McHale has blown this one big time, and now he is left with one of two choices to appease the 7-foot MVP.

1. Retire unceremoniously, and let Fred Hoiberg clean up his mess, which would undoubtedly result in an off-season trade to bring in new younger talent to replace Garnett.

2. Get fired, and let Fred Hoiberg clean up his mess, which would undoubtedly result in an off-season trade to bring in new younger talent to replace Garnett.

Seriously, the Wolves have no options at this point. They crippled themselves with the Joe Smith fiasco, they let Sam Cassell and Latrell Sprewell walk all over them, and they have more holes to fill than one top ten draft pick this season can fill. Add to that their lack of trade commodities, and they are left with one scenario - trade the only player who has any value, and get a boat load of talent and draft picks in return.

Enter the Phoenix Suns.

There are a lot of "ifs" to reconcile before anyone can talk seriously about a Phoenix trade to pick up Minnesota's perennial All Star, All Defensive team member, and former league M.V.P., not the least of which regarding the league's luxury tax threshold. The Suns have been teetering the line for two years now, and Suns owner Robert Sarver has made it clear that he absolutely does NOT want to go there - with one caveat. If the Suns win the championship, it's hard not to look deeply at all options available to improve the team and keep its title hopes alive.

So if the Suns win the championship, Kevin Garnett can be one step closer to donning Purple and Orange.

But there is still more to it.

The Wolves need to rebuild, and to do that, they need draft picks. Now, and in the future, they need help from the college ranks. They need solid young players who have proved themselves, and they need to keep salaries relatively low in order to remain competitive for years to come.

Again - enter the Phoenix Suns...and another big IF.

If the Atlanta Hawks' recent tank-fest proves unsuccessful in terms of landing a top three pick in 2007, the Suns get that pick and put themselves in prime position to be a major cog within the off-season trade machine. Not only would they land anywhere from 4 to 7 in the draft, they also have Cleveland's (low to mid 20s) and their own (29). Three first round picks in the deepest draft of recent memory. That's one hell of a starting block for the trade season sprint.

Phoenix also has loads of cap-friendly contracts to play with. As always, number one on that list is Shawn Marion's max deal that has two years at $34.25 million left after this season ends. Compare that to Garnett's two years at $45 million, with the infamous opt-out after the 2008 season. Throw in Marcus Banks and a couple of those coveted draft slots, and the Suns are well within firing range of the 125% + 100k rule.

Not that he would have a choice in the matter, but would Marion go for it? Leave town to have a chance to prove his worth without the media distractions of a two-time M.V.P. and rising star? I'm sure he would, but I'm also sure that it would be nothing that he expected, and he would rue the day that he admitted as much to ESPN the Magazine. The grass is always greener, they say, and Minnesota is known more for its freezing winters than sprawling gardens.

It would be a hasty, ill-conceived move on the part of the Suns to pull a trigger on a Garnett for Marion deal. Why give up a player who meshes so well with this team simply on the basis that his salary does not? There are other ways, and Robert Sarver would have to bite the bullet that he might otherwise use to shoot himself in the foot.

The Suns will need to dump salary, regardless of the results of this postseason and whether or not they make a trade for Garnett. The payroll in Phoenix will be pushing the $77-78 million mark next season, and that's not counting the five roster spots the team has to fill, in accordance with the most recent collective bargaining agreement.

The odd thing about an NBA General Manager's job is that they constantly have to base their long-term goals on short-term expectations. They have to keep an eye on future free agent markets, draft classes, and trade possibilities, as well as all the salary implications that go with it - will their hands be financially tied in 3 years because of a deal they made last summer to win a championship this June?

It's a tough business, to be sure. So tough that the no-brainer signing of Boris Diaw to a $45 million contract last season is suddenly looking like the NBAPA coup of the new millennium, Kwame Brown and Michael Olawakandi notwithstanding. Reward a player for potential or one good year, and it could leave a franchise snake-bit for half a decade if the player doesn't pan out.

But I think that Diaw is a special case. He is the consummate team player, excellent passer from the high post, and has almost unparalleled court vision. His problem this year is that he has too many targets and not enough position. When Amare came back better than ever, and Leandro Barbosa emerged as the player we all thought he would be a year quicker than we all thought, Boris Diaw's place on the team got lost in the shuffle. Yes, he came to camp in the typical "I just got a HUGE extension, so now I can relax" shape that fans have seen all too often, but he IS a team guy, and he DID work himself back into shape well enough.

I just think that Diaw's place is as the focal point of a pivot passing offense, similar to Sacramento with Chris Webber. The difference is that he doesn't always need the ball in his hands. He'll be just as happy setting a screen for a shooter. But if the offensive set has broken down, he is the guy you send give the ball to, and he will find a play for someone.

Maybe I'm just trying to make a hard sell on a guy who has been a big disappointment this regular season, but I think that it would be a good scenario for Boris to be with a group of young guys that he can position for success - the kind of team that gets lost late in a game when the pressure is on, and no one knows what to do with the ball. He knows what others need to do.

For a team like Minnesota, Boris Diaw's 5 year, $45 million contract is a bargain.

Then there is Marcus Banks, who has been a complete bust, through no fault of his own, in Mike D'Antoni's system. This is a player that Minnesota traded for last season, and who took less money than Minnesota offered to sign with the Suns. Now they would have an opportunity to get him back at a discount, and that's always a smart business move. Minnesota doesn't have the big time ball moving system that Phoenix has, and Banks would benefit from a position that doesn't require the other-worldly decision making of Steve Nash.

So a package of Boris Diaw, Marcus Banks, Kurt Thomas' expiring contract (another "if" - if Thomas picks up his player option for the 2007-08 season, which he will most likely take), and two of Phoenix's first rounders, as well as a couple of future first and second round picks could be just the deal that Minnesota is not only looking for, but desperately needs in order to start over. The biggest bonus for them is that they would not have to start from ground zero, as they could easily be a .500 team with these components.

How would that work out for the Suns?

Not quite as well as many fans would hope, and certainly not well enough for Robert Sarver's check book.

Even if Phoenix makes that trade, title or not, they would be well over the projected luxury tax threshold the next two years. The more players the Suns give up, the more roster spots they would have to fill with less money than they had anticipated even without a Garnett trade.

After a trade like that, the Suns' salary would be around $78 million next season with 7 spots to fill, and a whopping $82.4 million in 2008 with the same 7 spots open. That first year isn't so bad, considering that the salary is about the same with 2 fewer open roster spots. But 2008 would be more than $10 million over where it stands now, still with 7 open seats on the bench. Someone else would have to go, and that someone is Shawn Marion (2008-09 is the last year of his max deal). A championship before then would certainly make the bitter pill of losing the Matrix much easier to swallow for all parties involved - team, player, and fans.

I haven't even started talking about the chemistry issues. As good a guy as he seems to be, Kevin Garnett can be volatile when things go bad. Sure, winning cures all athletic ills, but how would he handle having to share the floor with his second coming, Amare Stoudemire?

How would Amare take having to share the spotlight with yet another M.V.P. candidate, when he wants that award so badly for himself? Worst and most importantly of all, they play the same position with a lot of similarities. They both excel at facing the basket in the low post, and both have decent mid-range jumpers. They both like to attack the rim, and both demand the ball.

I'm sure that Amare looks up to KG and respects him immensely, but two big, hungry dogs can't share the same bowl.

To be honest, as intriguing as the prospect may be, I don't see this kind of deal working for the Suns. Whether Marion or Diaw is the centerpiece of the Suns' end, the salary and on-court ramifications look to be too great an obstacle. There are just too many things that would have to go right, and even more that could go wrong in a deal like that to make it worthwhile for a team homing in on (hopefully) its first championship trophy.